-7.3: Stirrup Pants’ Comeback

stirrup pants

Occasionally I have nightmares about the puffy painted t-shirts and striped, threadbare stirrup pants I wore all the way through 6th grade. Now I hear you can buy stirrup pants from 7 jeans for $168, or from Bebe for $129. Apparently Jennifer Hudson was seen wearing them on the set of the “Sex and the City” movie. They’re the new-old hot thing.

Let’s look at the pros and cons of stirrup pants for a second here, just to make sure we’re giving them a fair shot at being this season’s retro-chic fashion comeback.

Pro

  • Stirrup helps leggings not ride up your calf–suspenders for the ankles
  • You’re always ready to rock the side ponytail, oversized sweater, or 80s dance party
  • Con

  • Nightmares of elementary school
  • As with skinny jeans, I must wonder: Who actually looks good in these?
  • Stirrup pants almost always come with a high waist. And we know what DOA thinks of that.
  • Cowboys need stirrups. Stretch pants do not. (For that matter, do women ever need to wear stretch pants in public?) Stop the madness. End the 80s fashion revival. These pants were not classic then, and they are not any more classic now.

    What’s next, the return of scrunchies?
    stirrup pants

    Powered by Gregarious (42)
    Share This

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.


    Close
    E-mail It
    Socialized through Gregarious 42